• Maetani@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    6 days ago

    In a fair fight sure, but this sneaky fucker can read inputs like those cheaty fighting games bots

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 days ago

    All the posts are about combat between some guy with a short sword vs. a spear. No one has considered Paul’s ability to predict future actions and using that to determine the best outcome. Much like fighting a Jedi (who presumably could anticipate the immediate future), how can you fight someone who already knows how you’ll move and the best counter?

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It was made abundantly clear that Paul could not use his prescience that way.

      However, Paul being hyper-observant would see your moves as they happened and would react before you’re even finished making them, just as in his first fight where he killed for the first time.

      Paul would win, undoubtedly.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Geronimo shredded motherfuckers with a spear. Dude was a master, one of his stories was about killing a whole regiment of Mexican Army who were armed with guns and he and only one or two other tribes men walked away and Geronimo was covered in blood and guts with only his spear left as a weapon.

  • BlazarNGC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    You only get a short time with the pointy end of the spear and then once a sword wielder is inside your range, you’ve got an unwieldy stick and they have a sword. Good for stand off melee maybe but prob not. Go swords.⚔️

    • Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      So you’re saying, once you lose your advantage you gain a disadvantage? This the kind of religious propaganda that put Atreides on the throne

      • BlazarNGC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m just saying you better be hot fire with that spear. Otherwise you’re getting cut.

        • dwindling7373@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Absolutely not. It’s the other way around there’s a reason any army get spears while swords are just a simbol for nobility.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I always find it fascinating the kind of things people will say because they saw a YouTube video once while ignoring all the actual historical context, like the Romans building their empire by fighting spear phalanxes with sword (and javelin) based legions.

            • dwindling7373@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              I’m not an expert, are you? All the in dephts historical weapon stuff I met in my life has told me and confirmed me spears win against swords.

              • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                I didn’t say spears didn’t win against swords.

                Spears are easier to wield, it’s a pointy stick. It requires less training to use. Requires significantly less materials to make.

                They are a standoff weapon though, in close combat a sword or small bladed weapon wins. Different tools for different purposes.

                The information I’m parroting is from experts and historians and literature and everything I’ve read over my 4 decades, it’s common knowledge at this point and not really worth “arguing” imo.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          At close range the spear becomes a staff which can block the knife and give a concussion thwack.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      You only get a short time with the pointy end of the spear and then once a sword wielder is inside your range, you’ve got an unwieldy stick and they have a sword. Good for stand off melee maybe but prob not.

      Yes, but getting in close without getting stabbed is really hard.
      Here’s an actual example of modern HEMA folks giving it a lot of goes:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLLv8E2pWdk

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I fenced in college against people with slightly longer arms and just that minor difference put me at a huge disadvantage.

        • Phineaz@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I feel you. I know how many hits I can get in just stabbing at unexpected moments at long range with my sword, with a spear it would be plenty easier.