• Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s unrelated because you’ve constructed a strawman who doesn’t want expansion of public transit who you’re thrashing when literally nobody has said that and literally everyone here has explicitly said they want expansion of public transit.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      One needs to construct a strawman when the person you’re arguing with has made no attempt to make any kind of actual argument, and just thrust a single word into a discussion.

      Maybe construct an argument of your own to get defensive about before reacting so harshly.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I could and did forgive the original response for exactly the reason you said.

        But in my follow up, I clarified my position and point, and that being ignored is why I’m stating it as being a strawman. I explicitly said I support public transportation.

        Let me say it again: I explicitly said I support public transportation.

        Let me say it a FIFTH TIME NOW: I SUPPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION.

        How many times need it be said before buddy stops characterizing my position as being against public transportation?

        Sincerely, how many times?