• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    He did actually make this argument when he said pornographic material depicting minors being available would lower cases of sexual assault…

    YOU added the “minors” part. The person you replied to isn’t talking about minors. They used the word “women” specifically. Ironic that you said this earlier:

    You, on the other hand, are very good at making up arguments to put in my mouth.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ahh yes I forgot to disregard all context of the argument. That’s my favorite tool in discourse, personally! Have anything to say to the rest of my comment? The actual important part?

      Of course not…

          • Chozo@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh no, I know the game very well. In fact, I know the game well enough to know that the images you posted are not from this game. Genshin Impact is a completely separate franchise from Zenless Zone Zero. This is the character from the article, who is most assuredly not a child.

            I’m not sure if you’re being an idiot on purpose, or if it’s an accident.

            • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Oh that’s totally my b. I got confused. I think the article may have mentioned genshin impact somewhere.

              Anyway, I took a look and you’re right only half the cast is child-coded! Great! Now let’s get the other half too!

              • Chozo@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I think the article may have mentioned genshin impact somewhere.

                It didn’t. Just like nobody ever argued for sexualizing minors.

                This isn’t the first thing you’ve just made up in this thread. I’m beginning to think that you’re acting in bad faith here.

                • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You’re correct that nobody has quite said the quiet part out loud yet except for myself and the initial comment I was replying to.

                  And again, nobody is interested in arguing about the points to do with sexualization of minors in video games and anime, despite that being the comment thread they replied to.

                  Yes I’ve made mistakes and committed fallacies in this argument. No, I am not arguing in bad faith. Nor do I intend to.

                  Nobody has replied to the salient points, nor the research I’ve raised, and that saddens me, as it means people are more interested in keeping their lolicon games than reducing issues affecting real people, and as a survivor of childhood sexual assault myself, I find that pretty fucked up. I would hope that even somebody who hasn’t gone through what I have would have the same proclivity to protect living, breathing children over having unfettered access to lolicon games that sexualize minors but this thread has shown me that this is not the case.

                  Goodbye