Even gamers nexus’ Steve today said that they’re about to start doing Linux games performance testing soon. It’s happening, y’all, the year of the Linux desktop is upon us. ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

Edit: just wanted to clarify that Steve from GN didn’t precisely say they’re starting to test soon, he said they will start WHEN the steam OS releases and is adopted. Sorry about that.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    To anyone reading this thinking “once SteamOS comes out, I’ll switch”, you should know:

    Gaming on Linux is already here. Pick a distro and game. You can take advantage of Proton right now. You don’t need to wait for one specific distro.

    I’ve personally been gaming on Linux exclusively for about 3 years. Windows games, not Linux games.

    Edit: based on other commenters’ suggestions, I’ll give you some.

    I have gamed for those three years on PopOS. It is a distro based on Debian, ultimately, which means it’s also related to Ubuntu and Mint. Realistically, you can pick any of those 4 and you should have a nice experience.

    Arch is popular with the übergeeks, and I do use it on my laptop, BTW, but you shouldn’t use it as a first distro.

    The concept of “distro” doesn’t really exist for Windows, because you pretty much get one monolithic product. But basically, it is a specific mix of software that works together and relies on the Linux kernel. Imagine it as a “version” of Windows with specific goals, some of which are overlapping (e.g. Mint and Ubuntu tend to cater to the same audience).

    If you get far enough into it, the freedom that Linux allows means that you can turn any distro into any other distro.

      • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think that is perfectly valid and I’ll happily recommend steamos to newcomers. I’m only a little worried about it being locked to flatpaks by default though. Hopefully that will change, but for most users it will be a good start.

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The typical linux flow is not important to learn for most and flatpak is easier for the vast majority of people to understand and deal with

            furthermore flatpak is rapidly becoming the typical linux flow

          • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            One flatpak uses a lot of extra disk space, but for each additional flatpak you add to a system the disk space difference is much smaller because they share dependencies. When it’s system-wide for all user-installed packages, the difference is quite small.

              • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                They don’t share dependencies with the base system, but they do share dependencies with each other, so long as those dependencies are at the same version, which most of them are because flatpaks generally stay quite up to date.

    • vort3@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s actually surprising how easy it is to use.

      My wife was playing Baldur’s Gate 3 on her windows laptop (GOG version, DRM free) and I just wanted to see if I can run it on my Linux laptop.

      Just copied the game folder from her laptop to my external SSD, plugged it into my laptop, ran through proton. Everything works without any issues. Simple as that.

      I was pleasantly surprised. We could even join via LAN and had some co-op fun. After trying it out I think I’m buying the game.

    • haulyard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Sons is mostly playing Valorant right now on Windows 11. I’m an old dude familiar with FreeBSD, and Debian. No clue about running games and stuff though. Would he be able to switch?

      edit: thanks for the insight. Sounds like a no-go for now until anti-cheat stuff is supported outside windows.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes, anti-cheat specifically is a problem. That’s you fighting against the corpos, to be clear. Not really an issue with gaming on Linux itself.

        Edit: not only against the corpos, but more generally against the idea of “kernel-level anti-cheat”. If you’re giving any corporation kernel-level access to your machine, you basically no longer control your machine. That’s true of Windows too.

        It’s a big issue and the lack of support on Linux is a bit of a feature, not really a bug.

  • somenonewho@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been using Linux exclusively for ~14 years now. Heavily gaming on Linux only for the last ~8 years.

    It was possible (though sometimes headache inducing) to play most games back then (Wine and soon Proton to thank) the biggest change IMHO came with SteamPlay since it turned the headache into one click on most games (thanks to the amazing work of wine/proton developers and the tinkering of the community).

    When the SteamDeck released people seemed surprised at the breadth of games that were running on day one. To me it was not really a surprise since I had been Linux gaming with SteamPlay all the time and was almost expecting games to “just work” (though I still would and still am checking ProtonDB before purchase).

    What the SteamDeck changed in my view was

    1. Showing “everyone” that Linux Gaming is a thing that’s happening and been happening for a while. So maybe check it out?
    2. That a Handheld that doesn’t have to work around Windows but uses a purpose built OS just makes a lot more sense

    I feel that the SteamDeck with SteamOS has really put Linux, especially Linux gaming on the map. Even though I want to be like “Linux Gaming has been a thing forever, I was doing it before it was cool” ;) I have to recognize that fact. In the past years I’ve seen so many people setting up Linux especially by the way of SteamOS (using HoloISO, Chimera …) just to play/mess with it which is also why I think an Official SteamOS release will make a huge difference.

    Tl;dr: Gaming on Linux was a thing before. But the SteamDeck/SteamOS 3 made a huge impact nonetheless.

    • pizza_the_hutt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      IMO, no one should be playing games with kernel level anticheat. There is no way I would let any big gaming company have that level of control over my PC. It’s a security nightmare.

      • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wonder if Valve will eventually offer their own system of checks similar to Google Play Integrity? I don’t think I’d care for it since it’s an invasion of personal choice on a device that you own, but for people who want to play competitive games with cheating problems, running a partition with integrity checking seems a fair trade.

        • lordnikon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah you can do most of that server side but they don’t want to pay for it. Why pay when your players let you coop their machine for free or even better yet pay you for the privilege. Also player run dedicated servers would fix all of this. Don’t like the cheaters movement servers. Own the server ban them. We had this working just fine in the 90s.

  • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I jumped into Linux, via Mint, about a year ago when I refreshed my hardware. The transition was pretty easy, and I haven’t looked back. Steam runs fine and I haven’t had a modern game that didn’t work under default proton settings except for things I’ve run outside Steam and mods. Most of my personal PC’s workload is gaming and handful of web-based apps that are effectively OS-agnostic; Everything else has an easy equivalent in the apt repos.

    I would say that my decision to embrace Linux as my OS was primarily influenced by my Steam Deck. Gaming on it has been simple and the desktop UI was easy to adapt to. I replaced my laptop with the Steam Deck, bluetooth keyboard and mouse, and a USB-C dock with HDMI out (all things I already had for the laptop). I now just hook into whatever TV is handy as a monitor when I need a computer on the go.

    I was a tech enthusiast when I was younger, and am thus familiar with fucking around on the command line, but now I’m an old man who just wants his stuff to work and it just has… The barrier of entry for the Linux Desktop is effectively gone. We just need PR now.

    Also, I think I’d replace Mint on my primary PC with SteamOS, given a simple way to do so. About a year ago, the desktop/beta SteamOS was not fully baked.

  • Patariki@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just build a new gaming/creative pc, decided to make the jump to linux mint while i was setting up something new. And I honestly expected more hickups than i got, nothing which a quick search didn’t fix except for one. My xbox controller won’t connect over Bluetooth, it works when connected through a cable though. But I also noticed some stick drift, so I’m tossing it and order an 8bitdo which has those magentic sticks (forgot the name) and linux compatibility.

  • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just did that. I have a dual boot laptop where Windows was used exclusively for games, and instead of upgrading that I built myself a PC with an AMD GPU (Nvidia, fuck you!).

    So far I haven’t run into any problem that I couldn’t easily solve, and the only games that won’t run are those demanding I install an anti cheat system, but I’m fine not playing those.

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I don’t understand this tbh. It’s here already. SteamOS will likely be just like the deck - immutable arch running the existing steam package.

    You can totally do this today and it works great. Don’t want to mess with arch and that confusing command line? Use something easier like mint and install the flatpak - then you don’t even have to futz with nvidia drivers. Or use bazzite?

    What does steamOS offer that we don’t already have? (Serious question)

  • brewbart@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Whelp I tried to switch several years ago to PopOS! as daily driver. Everything was fine and dandy until I tried to use the side buttons of my Razer mouse or my Keychron M3. Short story: not plug-and-play-able. This is a non negotiable feature for me. Maybe I’ll find some motivation between the years to tinker again…

    • penquin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is not a Linux issue, I’m sure you know that. It’s the manufacturer who doesn’t want to support Linux. Also, many things work now. I have a reddragon mouse and all of the side buttons on it work just fine. As for keychron, I have the V6 and V5 and I use VIA to program the buttons and everything else on it and it works with 0 issues. Maybe give that a shot?

      • brewbart@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah I know that Razer is not really motivated to play with Linux :/

        As for VIA - that is on my todo list for next time. I’m just avoiding changing my daily driver mouse, because I really like the feel of my Razer mouse…:/

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The only bastion left is anticheat. Everything else are just (bad) old habits fueled by marketing.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      …and VR. VR is already finicky on its own, gaming on Linux can be finicky in different ways, and the issues multiply if you have two things like that.

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Tends to depend on the headset you own, some work perfectly. Also, Valve is very likely releasing a headset based on SteamOS, which should help.

        • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Sure, the Index should work fine, but I’m not so sure about accessories, my Slimes, etc. Also on an nvidia GPU…

          Really hope Valve does indeed release the new headset, because my Index is getting very dated.

          • priapus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            Completely depends on the accessories, and an nvidia GPU is unlikely to have a major impact, I’ve used one for VR before. What are slimes?

            • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              Slimes as in SlimeVR, open source trackers.

              I think it all should work, but I’m afraid of just having to solve issues in general with stuff I don’t have to solve any issues with now.

              • priapus@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                16 days ago

                I assumed it was that. I saw explicit Linux support on their site, so wanted to confirm.

                Nothing wrong with having that fear, just not super fair to assume it won’t work in that case. Both the devices you’ve mentioned have good Linux support, and would likely work pretty well out of the box.

                • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Yeah, it’s also that “it just works” now, and one undisputable (though unfortunately self-fulfilling) advantage of Windows is that chances are if you do encounter an issue you’re not the first one and someone has already solved it.

                  Being an early(ish) adopter of anything like that is always a bit of a risk and pain.

  • gramgan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I thought this had already happened?

    I remember seeing ads on Steam for SteamOS years ago—wasn’t there a point at which you could download and run it on your own computer? What happened?

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Old steam os was an Ubuntu derived OS. Ubuntu has issues relating to the organization that runs it. New steam os is basically a coat of paint on top of Arch which is community based. The old os is deprecated.

      The version on steam deck is fantastic, but they have been polishing it for desktop use for a while now. I can’t wait to have it available.

  • Noved@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    New to the Linux community here; why is a valve owned Linux OS better than any other massive company OS. Like if Microsoft released their own Linux OS, would it be good suddenly?

    At the end of the day, we don’t want our OS’s big company owned right?

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Valve dosnt really “own” SteamOS. They maintain and update SteamOS, but SteamOS is free and open source

      Plus just about everbody who knows anything about valve would tell you they are probably the most consumer friendly billion dollar company ever, and have been for decades. So yes even if they owned it like microsoft owns windows it would still be better

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been saying for years: we need a dedicated gaming operating system.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        cloud native

        Already rings an alarm bell, but thank you for sharing regardless.

        Also, their website runs like shit. I don’t have much hope for them making a gaming OS that doesn’t, but time will tell.

    • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      No we don’t. Who needs that? That’s what consoles are for. Every time I want to play on my computer I would need to dual boot and change to the OS? That’s nonsense

      Game Devs and device driver Devs need to get their shit together and fix things.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    As long as they can keep it rolling stable, which is possible even with arch, I can see this pickup up a bit, especially for new users.

    Plenty of users are sick of windows 11.