• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It probably annotates abbreviation of the full year 1985 1986 1987, etc, so people don’t get confused and think Tom Cruise was 87 when he married Mimi Rogers.

      I can’t say if it’s a good or bad annotation, but theres a possible explanation.

          • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Just to be pedantic, you should use “whoever” there, not “whomever.”

            To tell whether to use “who” or “whom,” replace it with “he” or “him” and follow the ‘m.’

            “he made this” vs “him made this”

              • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Sure!

                “If I’m asked, I’ll give grammar tips to whomever.”

                Whomever is tough, because often this would be constructed as “I’ll give grammar tips to whoever asks.” And you would use “who” there, because “whoever” is the subject of the clause “whoever asks.”

                Generally speaking, it’s usually safe to pick “whoever” over “whomever.”

                But if you drop the “-ever” it’s a lot easier. Anywhere you’d use “him” (that is, the objective pronoun), you use “whom.” To whom, for whom, by whom, etc.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Idk why or who makes the conventions. It might be a required format, kind of like how you’re supposed to start numbering pages in APA after the title page.