Summary

Sen. Bernie Sanders is touring Iowa and Nebraska to rally against “the oligarchy,” aiming to energize progressives rather than launch a 2028 presidential bid.

At 83, he seeks to shape the Democratic Party’s future, arguing it lost in 2024 by neglecting working-class voters.

He hopes to influence budget battles and the 2026 midterms, targeting GOP lawmakers in battleground districts.

With Democrats lacking clear leadership, Sanders’ prominence and focus on economic inequality could define the party’s direction in the Trump-Musk era.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      6 days ago

      While I feel bernie wants to save capitalism from itself rather then replace it, I have to admire the persistence. I would have died 3 deaths of despair if I would have gone through what he has. And to just watch the nation melt around you no matter what you do or say.

      Bernie Sanders is a stronger man then me

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    The sudden rush of tankies in the comments indicates to me that this is a strong enough move to make some oligarchs worried.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Is a tankie someone who blindly supports the military indistrial complex? Or is it someone who loves tank sized SUVs?

      • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        They’re blind apologists for the various left regimes that have identified themselves as leftist, anti-imperialist, anti-western, sometimes even including North Korea and Cambodia under Pol Pot. Often they align themselves with right-wing governments like modern Russia and Iran, because they’re against the geopolitical west.

        The term was coined after the USSR rolled tanks into Hungary in the 50’s to squash pro (Socialist) democracy protests. Some leftists stuck with the Soviets as they matched into Hungary and Praugue, and others spoke out against what they saw as tyrannical repression of democracy.

      • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        tankie is one who says all the mass murders, genocide, rape et all communists have done historically didnt exist\was okay.

        • renzev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          have done historically didnt exist\was okay.

          More like “didn’t exist, but was okay even if it did” lol.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Bernie told me to vote for the Democrat every time he lost the primary to them, I did what Bernie told me.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Exactly. Read any of his books. He understands that the only way a progressive party will ever gain power in this country is by running as Democrats and exerting progressive political capital to reform the Democratic party.

        Bernie knows that the most staple progressive issues are wildly popular with the American people, and he knows probably better than anyone alive in this country today that progressives are up against on oligarchy with unlimited control over the media and unlimited financial and human resources to fight progressive agendas, and get he still fights. Why? See point two: progressive policy is wildly popular in the United States and we outnumber the billionaires.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          There’s no reason we can’t fix that by implementing rank choice voting. It works great in several places in the US.

  • ProtecyaTec@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Real Question - Bernie Sanders is old; it’s 83. If Bernie passes - who carries on his message? AOC? Who fr? You?

    Which, in my opinion, the message is honest outreach to people, IRL, and share the message that Billionares are buying our Politicians which needs to be addressed (like, the sooner the better)?

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m subscribed to both his YT channels and he’s been running a full offensive for decades, nothing seems to be changing recently on that front.

    • Ronno@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      But is capitalism really the issue here? As far as I can tell, you can put in place any economic agenda, if people just vote against themselves and if laws are actively ignored, the economic policy doesn’t really matter?

      • data_lore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You are right that you can have authoritarian policies in any economic system, but capitalism in America has led to our authoritarianism. Capitalism does this as it relies on single ownership of the means of production, so it inherently centralized power and wealth.Think about the oligarchs, they control how wealth is distributed through their companies. If their workers had a say in the sharing of the profits, there is no way people would vote to give people enough wealth to control the globe while screwing over the rest of us. Also, if people are more individualized, like in America, they vote less on their group benefit, and what they see as their own benefit. This leads to fascism’s easy rise to power, but putting the blame on others.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Laws are often ignored in history through periods of change; I’d say it’s a matter of people agreeing or disagreeing with them.

        In this case, it’s about a very strong push by very wealthy people to trick masses of followers into thinking their billionaire daddy’s are fighting for them.

        Ostensibly, that push would be harder if there was not such a uniform path to wealth disparity where one idiot owns so much.

  • JamieSTL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think usually Bernie means well, but I think Democratic party is far beyond saving. We will have no significant progress no less opposition to fascism, until they are gone.

    Electoralism is largely a dead end under the duopoly.

      • JamieSTL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s not defeatism, it’s an acknowledgment that we need to look beyond electoralism within the Dems. Mutual aid, dual power, direct action. If electoralism, build a grass roots infrastructure for a new third party or help an existing one rise.

        Third party success won’t happen with just running someone for president every four years. It has to start at very local level, and engage with the public between elections.

    • NoEsReal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      This strategy is literally how you resolve that issue though. The Democratic Party is just a vehicle, it literally used to be a pro-slavery party. It can be remade just like Trump remade the Republican Party in his image. Bernie is doing exactly what needs to be done. It’s by no means the only strategy, but it is an important one to pursue.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      He should be pushing to replace First past the post voting so these 3rd parties can compete with the democrats on who can smash the republicans the best.

      Defeating the Republicans is more important then the Democratic party. Democrats have lost their unearned privilege to go it alone against the republicans. Pass the reforms in blue states and we will work on the red states together

      • Marand@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That would mean gathering enough support to do it from people that got where they are because of it. It seems impossible.

  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m at my states Capitol protesting and it’s kind of scary how many Trump supporters have driven by. But make no mistake, most are not for him. Call your representatives and demand action today. Don’t wait.

  • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Unless the democratic party’s platform becomes deny the oligarchy access to the levers of power, defend the working and middle class against the billionaires, and depose those who would enact political violence via law or pen, I’m not interested.

      • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it must be a mother fucking duck. He talks one thing while asking us to support his good friends, the oligarchy.

        • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          right, the only person in washington trying to get money out of politics is for the oligarchy. the one person who brow beats against the oligarchy, is actually for the oligarchy. you’re a straight up moron, my dude.

          • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Someone who talks about oligarchy and then tells us that we need to support his good oligarchy buddies is a tool.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      So just let the republicans rule forever nice choice.

      • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s hard to tell the difference between Democrats and Republicans. They both seem to embrace the same ideology.

        • shaggyb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          No it isn’t.

          Republicans are fascist, eugenicist, lead-addled dementia patients with no regard for human life outside their immediate families and even then only to the degree that they can be exploited. Their core values are narcissism and personal greed.

          Democrats are performatively-compassionate cowards who are terrified of change and value avoiding conflict above anything else. Their core values are looking outwardly like they give a damn and not being yelled at by anybody.

          The two are incredibly distinct from one another.

          • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Fascism cannot rise on its own. Fascism is only possible with a weak, complicit liberal party. Their continual ratchet effect has enabled Our current level of fascism in this country.

  • Amon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Unfortunately he’ll probably end up the first to go in front of the firing squad

      • TheWilliamist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Probably Douglas Adam’s:

        The Encyclopedia Galactica defines a robot as a mechanical apparatus designed to do the work of a man. The marketing division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation defines a robot as "Your Plastic Pal Who’s Fun to Be With.” The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy defines the marketing devision of the Sirius Cybernetic Corporation as "a bunch of mindless jerks who’ll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes…”