• Sheldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t read it like that. The sentence just says that their pay rate has that amount, not that it is connected to them not being a union member.

      • Sheldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        The people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement.

        You are thinking way too much into that statement, the way I described is the way it works here, and that seems much more likely tbh.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement.

          That’s literally what I’m saying.

          • Sheldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You are saying it’s union members vs non union members being separated.

            And it’s not.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The union members are included in the “we” that contractually makes $0.50/hr more than… union members?

              • Sheldan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 minutes ago

                The contract negotiated by the unions just defines the minimum, union members can earn more.