• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s astounding how stupid that decision was. Fakespot, quite literally a device to help deter people from buying products, was gobbled up by way too much money by Mozilla - who - apparently wanted it to make profit? How?! Why?! Why did they even buy it?

      I think it was just executive idiocy. They searched for extensions with the term privacy in them, bought it, and thought it would make their product worth more. I’m getting really tired of companies just sunsetting products the instant they don’t make money.

      We really need an open version of fakespot.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think it can be VERY valuable especially today with all the ai spam.

        It’s not about buying less, it’s about people making you a trusted source when they look to buy.

        I cannot believe they are stupidly abandoning this, it could be a gold mine

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I expect that Fakespot already had problems funding themselves, and thus they were a relatively cheap acquisition, and now it turned out they couldn’t cover their own costs as part of Mozilla either. But I’ve never used it so I have no idea.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      what’s up with ending FakeSpot? They just bought that.

      Assuming the tool was not accepted and used well enough by the user base. Also Mozilla got all user data and the technology. Maybe they plan on a new project that implements part of it in the future? Mozilla is currently experimenting a lot. Shutting down lot of services should be expected.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        it was never available outside the usa i think. hard to get useful market penetration then