• RekcuffuckeR@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guess is it’s just what they were raised into and most don’t care to question it. I might be wrong

    • SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the result of several different avenues.

      During life in slavery, religion would be presented as the place where the little morals slavers displayed came from. “Sure, this asshole has you enslaved, forces you to work most of the day, whips you and will possibly rape your daughter, but the reason he [small act of generosity] is because he’s Christian”. The same religious ideology ultimately condoned slavery, but it wasn’t presented to them that way.

      If a slave wanted to learn to read and the means were presented to them, the Bible would be present in some way or another.

      During the early decades after emancipation, Christianity was already somewhat entrenched among black people, so the place where they’d gather together in community would be religious rituals.

      From that point onwards, black communities being Christian was a self-perpetuating dynamic.

      It wasn’t something born out of rationality with all options and perspectives being presented to them, but rather due to circumstance, lesser evils and lack of better alternatives. There are black people who see things the way you have explained it to them - but only after the process of deconversion, which tends to get one alienated from their community.

    • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      first: there are no black (or white (or yellow!)) people. It’s a colonial and racist heritage to talk about “black people”.

      2nd: There were christian communities (or kingdoms) in africa before anybody in europe (let alone americas) heard about jesus

      • fkn@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is patently untrue and a form erasure.

        There are black Americans. If you talk to them, and ask if they are African American they will tell you no, because they are not African. They are just Americans. Same as the are white Americans.

        You don’t get to choose.

        • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          i know that in “America”, still to day, people who are “imported” from Africa during colonialism are called “black”. Racial theories of the past are banalized today.

          • fkn@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This right here is racism. The “I know where black people came from.” Racism. The micro-agressions of erasing a swath of people’s existence. The inability to even say the word slavery, denying an entire sorrid period of American history. The fucking audacity to say that a black or African or African Americans lived existence is trivializing their past.

            • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              when i write “imported”, i of course am writing about slavery. My comment is not about denying all the suffering slaves and their children and their children’s children had to go through or are still going through. Imported means a “soulless” object (like animals too were considered to be back then), a slave.

              My comment is about, like i wrote, racial color codification and banal use of it in phrases like "i’ve noticed that a lot of black people …

              • fkn@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Except when combined with your previous post it denotes, excludes, marginalizes and codifies a race of people in a way that just isn’t true for many modern black Americans.

                Black Americans are not necessarily descendents of slaves. Some black Americans that are descendents of slaves are no more African than I am(or I am as African as they are depending on how you want to say it). Many black Americans are as much European as they are African (through the 1 drop rulings and the often raped slaves)… And all of this denies the black Americans existence since slavery. The unique situation of black Americans, where national origin is irrelevant… It is purely a white privilege to say that “white” or “black” is not a race. It’s tantamount to saying that Nazis only killed white people.

                • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  white or black is not a race. there are no races.

                  Nazis killed many people from diverse backgrounds with self proclaimed or imposed identities. They were (and their neos are) despicable

      • Hypersapien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        We acknowledge that the way we divide ethnic genetic variety into different races is a social construct, entirely invented by humans. But denying that race exists at all does no favors to the victims of racism.

        • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          yes, you’re right. Looks like it was simultaneous.

          I was thinking of a more gradual expansion towards Europe through Syria, Anatolia, Byzantium &c. They don’t need to establish their religion to run to Rome and tell people there about Jesus. Thank you for taking the time to correct what i wrote and what i had in mind.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hearing about is not the same as converted. Some people in Rome became Christians. Hence Peter being Bishop of Rome. It just wasn’t a full conversion empire-wide until Constantine.