• MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    USA has ass-backwards system for getting drivers license. At least from I could find online. You get learners permit after passing written exam. That’s not nearly enough. In my country you have to attend 20 hours (optional depending on existing licenses) of theory, then pass theoretical exam. Then you have a driving instructor assigned to you for total 40h (or 20h depending on existing licenses) in 1h sessions. You first start training court where you train to start, stop, turn and other driving maneuvers. When instructor deems you ready for traffic only then you get to drive with them in the car and having dual controls for the vehicle. Only when instructor deems you ready you are allowed to take the test for getting the license. And even on the test you first have to pass training court before you are allowed to enter traffic.

    By the time you got learners permit you have at least 40h of driving in traffic which is significantly better than just passing written exam.

    In my eyes, law is not the problem but experience and people paying attention. Phones, doing makeup, eating food and other things should be forbidden in car because it distracts you too much.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US is too car-dependent to make a drivers license harder or more expensive to get. Less safety is the price we pay.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If someone is too stupid to learn to drive safely maybe we don’t need them participating in society anyway.

        • Reddit_Is_Trash@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are free to participate in society, just not drive on the roads. It’s their fault if they can’t learn how to drive.

          We need to hold people to some standard. If they are incapable of learning how to drive, we should direct resources to those who are. It’s time we stop catering to the lowest common denominators of society

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            When I was taking the test prior to my appointment was a girl who failed, and I kid you not, 8-9 times already. She was shaking out of fear. We had a common instructor so I overheard him tell her where she commonly makes mistakes. Basically her driving is fine but she doesn’t follow signs one bit. She would drive fast in school zone or blow through stop signs. And I completely agree, some standards must be upheld. Just being able to get the vehicle moving is not a reason enough to own a license. You need to be able to be part of the system.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your roads are wider as well, which someone thought was a great idea for lowering number of traffic accidents, but in reality it only makes people drive faster and more reckless.

      • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, and we are generally not willing (as a society) to pay decent wages for things like teachers, so getting drivers ed teachers for all student drivers would be not possible. Private lessons would work but that would make it unavailable to a lot of less affluent people.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You pay much MUCH more for your car dependency, you just don’t even realize how bad it is

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are at least 50 different systems for getting a driver’s license in the US since each state issues its own license. Some states are far more rigorous than others. My home state has a system similar to what you describe only it includes an additional 40 hours driving with another licensed adult, in addition to the hours spent driving with a certified instructor and the classroom hours.

      The state I live in now? Not so much. They basically just give out licenses to anyone who shows up, pays the fee and can show that they know what the different pedals do. Unfortunately this produces terrible drivers, as you would expect.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just did a causal search and got that info but I fully expected a difference between states. Not to such a huge degree. Professional instructors can never be replaced by adult who has a license, no matter how many hours of experience they have. Instructors deal with beginners every day and are familiar with most common mistakes. They also have to be certified here and retake that certification on regular basis.

        Saddest thing of all is that safety is lowest common denominator. You can be a good driver and even have tons of experience, all it takes to get hurt or killed is one poor driver. If your own safety in traffic depended on your own skill and you couldn’t hurt anyone else, then by all means take as poor exam as you want but that’s not the case.

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It all depends upon state. I think the learners permit requires another licensed, adult driver to be in the vehicle and has other restrictions.

      That said, I’m with you. I originally learned to drive in rural Ohio. I moved to Japan and finally decided to get my license. Since my Ohio license expired, I had to start from zero. I spent two weeks knocking it out at a training camp (there’s a restriction on the number of hours of practical training per day, so there was a fair amount of free time). First, had to pass some basic checks. They did start practical on the first or second day on their closed course. There’s a mid-point test that one must pass before being able to go out on the roads. There’s a number of hours more of this and then two final tests (course and driving).

      I got my mid-sized motorcycle license this year and that was also a number of hours (I want to say 17 altogether since I had a regular car license), though exclusively on the closed course.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In my opinion, licensed adult is not the same as professional instructor. I also got my motorcycle license last year and the amount of knowledge and skill my instructor taught me was huge. It shouldn’t be a surprise since professionals will always be better at their profession than regulars but still it came as surprise.

        • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In my opinion, licensed adult is not the same as professional instructor

          Oh, definitely. I just added that in case anyone reading thought it meant they could just start driving on their own or something.