The economy’s strength and stability — defying many of the most optimistic predictions — represents a remarkable development after seemingly endless crises

As 2023 winds to a close, Powell and his colleagues are far from declaring victory on inflation. They routinely caution that their actions could be thwarted by any number of threats, from war in the Middle East to China’s economic slowdown. Americans are upset about high costs for rent, groceries and other basics, which aren’t going back to pre-pandemic levels. The White House, too, is quick to emphasize that much work remains.

Yet the economy is ending the year in a remarkably better position than almost anyone on Wall Street or in mainstream economics predicted, having bested just about all expectations time and again. Inflation has dropped to 3.1 percent, from a peak of 9.1. The unemployment rate is at a hot 3.7 percent, and the economy grew at a healthy clip in the most recent quarter. The Fed is probably finished hiking interest rates and is eyeing cuts next year. Financial markets are at or near all-time highs, and the S&P 500 could hit a new record this week, too.

  • Hello_there@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another narrative: employment was up and workers were gaining power. Out of nowhere, JP Morgan Chase chairperson started going to meetings and talking about a recession, over and over. Other businesses took his lead and started raising prices. After a while we’re no closer to a recession, but we have lost a lot in standard of living.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      When a handful of corporations control entire industries, capitalism stops working.

      It’s supposed to be a bunch of competitors trying to get as many sales as possible by having the lowest prices or highest quality.

      But in the current economy, if a corporation raises their prices across the board, the rest raise their prices. The only times they lower prices, is straight to a loss to force small competitors out of business. The large corporations can deal without profits for six months, smaller companies go under and often have to sell to the giant corporations.

      This cycle has been repeating for decades, it’s not hard to notice it

      The only solution is breaking up those giant corporations. Republicans sure as shit won’t do it, but neither will the moderate wing of the Democratic party. It would cut into their donations too much.

      If anything in the economy is “too big to fail” the solution is breaking them up, not bailing them out whenever necessary.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        When a handful of corporations control entire industries… that is capitalism. Capitalism isn’t some self-correcting system that benefits all, its a system that supports and benefits those who make the most profit possible. When companies have less competition and more control, they’re better able to make money. And thus, are better at capitalism.

        This isn’t capitalism failing to function, this is capitalism working as intended. The “free-market” is an illusion created on hope and delusion.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          What you’re doing is the same as saying universal healthcare and communism is the same thing…

          All capitalism isn’t “free market”. The government (at least supposed to) regulate capitalism. There was a time in America when it would even break up giant corporations who had monopolies. Lots of Americans alive today were even alive when it happened.

          Things changed in the 1990s when James Carville convinced people Bill Clinton caused the Dotcom boom with neoliberal economics.

          Suddenly both parties were bending over backwards to funnel money to the wealthy at the expense of what’s left of the middle class.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You’re demonstrating exactly why capitalism doesn’t work. Once corporations capture politicians and grow fat, it is incredibly difficult to get them out. This isn’t an aberration. It’s inevitable in thew long run.

            If Keynesians could implement their policies and hold them indefinitely, capitalism might work. They can’t.

            Unionize all the things.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              They shouldn’t be able to capture politicians the way they have, that’s a failure of the supreme court, which was also captured.

              Again, probably inevitable as you say, but that was in theory the last chance to stop it.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Unions imply capitalism, so… Sure I guess?

              Like the history is wrong, and the reasoning is hellaciously wrong, but unions are indeed good.

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            If Russia and China are what real world Communism always turns out to be, North America and Europe are what Capitalism always turn out to be

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          This isn’t capitalism failing to function, this is capitalism working as intended.

          Capitalism “working as intended” includes functional institutions that address externalities.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also stops working when the vast majority of the population lacks capital. The recent experiments with a UBI in Kenya show this pretty well. Folks who decided on a lump-sum payment rather than monthly invested in creating businesses and were better off.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you see excess stock? Profits are not particularly high after the two years of costs that COVID created. Trillions of dollars were printed during COVID while people were not working and products were not being manufactured/farmed/repaired/…

        There simply was/is more money floating around then stuff being produced. Unless God herself comes down and drops food/shelter/iPods from heaven, costs won’t come down. Failing that, it is up to us to produce these products otherwise nothing will change.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a rather long history of it taking a recession to stop inflation. That it didn’t this time is a very big deal.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s pretty basic supply and demand. Inflation historically goes up in an economy when a lot of people want to buy stuff, and that stuff is in limited supply.

      Workers had cash and stimulus money = higher demand

      The pandemic fucked with good manufacturing, and transport = reduced supply

      When there is less of something, and people have money, they’re willing to pay more to get their hands on the scarce thing. Companies pay more for chips, or to have first dibs on something from the port, and that increased cost is passed along to the consumer.

      • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are we really still pretending the “stimulus” money of a whopping1400 actually had an impact for 99% of people?

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, but 3 years of pent-up demand and crippled supply chain infrastructure did

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If it was merely an increase in costs, corporate profits should be neutral after they hike their prices to match. Same ratio going in and out.

        What we actually saw was corporate profit margins going to record highs. Some sectors did see actual price increases–pandemic supply constraints, the Suez canal being blocked up by a shipping accident, and the war in Ukraine all did cause upward pressure on prices in some sectors. However, none of it could explain the data fully.

        Even worse, those corporations saw 15-20% profit margins for the first time ever, and now their public stockholders expect them to keep doing it forever. This is insane. Big tech firms can see that kind of margin, but they’re the exception. Not even banks see those margins on the regular. The belief that they can has driven many of the layoffs from otherwise profitable companies this year.

        Corporations used world events as a cover for increasing prices. They had a once in a century opportunity to cover their actions and took it. To be honest, it usually is the case that prices don’t just go up as a matter of greed. That’s not what happened this time.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          If it was merely an increase in costs, corporate profits should be neutral after they hike their prices to match. Same ratio going in and out.

          You might see that initially, but all of the little supply and demand changes start to inflate the overall value of the dollar, that starts to show up in profits.

          Every company is affected differently during times of high inflation. I work for a fortune 50 company that had their earning take a hit because of inflated prices. That said, profit margins for many companies absolutely can and do inflate with the value of the currency.

          Your profits are fuel for future investments, and if your finance team is doing their job correctly, they are making sure that profit is adjusted for inflation.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If it was merely an increase in costs, corporate profits should be neutral after they hike their prices to match. Same ratio going in and out.

          You’re ignoring both the rise in demand and the increase in available spending money, and misunderstanding the relationship between profits and price.

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yo ngl I cannot care one iota about the S&P 500 when food costs nearly double what it did before the pandemic and rents are skyrocketing.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where I am, the $5 eggs are back down to $1.80, and the $6 milk is $2.89. Feels the same as before-times.

      It’s hard to find restaurant lunch under $15, which is around 50% more than 2019, and even the gyro counter added a default tip when they stopped accepting cash. That’s sad, but I cook more now.

      • June@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        2 years ago yogurt was 40 cents, today it’s 80. Bacon was $3 a pound, today the cheapest is $4.50 unless it’s on sale. Frozen pizzas were $4, $5 on the top end, now they’re $6-$15… for a frozen pizza. Ramen was 20 cents, today it’s 55. String cheese was $4, today it’s $7. A small bag of shredded cheese was $4, now it’s $8. Cereal was $3, today it’s $5 and you get less. Have you seen how expensive a bag or Doritos is? A small bag costs more than what a party size bag used to cost, and that’s true for all chips.

        I have dozens of items that are out of reach today that were common fare 3 years ago. Milk and eggs have come back down, yes, but not the rest of it.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I guess my response is that most of what you’ve listed are significantly-to-highly processed foods, and I lump them in the same bucket as ‘restaurants.’ To me, it’s not that the food has gotten expensive, so much as corporate structures are ‘extracting more value.’ And I do realize that a lot of people are in situations where those processed foods are their only practical options. I just think that General Mills, PepsiCo, and Blackstone deserve the blame and hate, more than ‘the economy.’

          BTW, I would love me some $4.50/pound bacon. I don’t remember it less than $6/12 oz in the last 5 years, except occasionally on sale. I used to see fairly regular $1/pound pork shoulder sales, and I haven’t seen that under $1.80 in a while, so there definitely are basic foods with inflated prices. My personal experience is that I still get out of the grocery store for the same $40 I was spending in 2018, although I have also given up chips and started making my own yogurt. Switched from beef to chicken, pork and beans, although that’s more for carbon reasons than cost.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here from Europe, a similar situation.

        Some things are still expensive, but a lot of things have gotten better.

        Moreover, salaries did increase, so I can’t complain too much.

        We are extremely fortunate to have so easily beaten this round of inflation.

      • numberfour002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s mostly the same here.

        Grocery prices have definitely gone up overall in my part of the world, but outside of outliers (or outright liars), prices aren’t double. But lots of people around here will claim their grocery bill is double what it was before covid. In general, I’m not willing to say any specific person’s “twice as much” isn’t true, I don’t know their circumstances, but my experience and pretty much all the reports I’ve seen don’t bear that out (again for my part of the world).

        The egg thing was a prime example. People were going around saying “eggs are $10 now” but then when I’d look at the local grocers, it was only the premium brands’ free range, organic, woman-owned, holistic, fair-trade type eggs that were anywhere close to that – and it was always the type of person that you know never bought those types of eggs to begin with.

        I have seen a lot of convenience and luxury grocery items that I used to buy have gone up around 50% or gone down the shrinkflation route. And for sure, there’s been an uptick in temporary shortages and price spikes.

        Restaurants around here are also like you mentioned. Prices have really gone up there. I don’t eat fast food often, but a month ago I was traveling and decided to get fast food breakfast at one of my old favorites. A biscuit and a drink used to cost around $3, now it’s nearly $8. Last year, I had a craving for Wendy’s and it was similar, the food that used to cost me just over $4 back in the day is now a bit more than $11. But then again, eating out is a luxury in pretty close to all circumstances.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel you, but there’s not much Biden can do about either thing.

      Unfortunately, he will get the blame for it anyway.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel you, but there’s not much Biden can do about either thing

        Weird the article is giving credit to Biden for inflation then…

        It’s just getting old that if something good happens, Biden gets credit. If something doesn’t get fixed, then it’s not his fault because he’s just the president.

        It’s the type of stuff I’m used to only hearing from Republicans.

        I mean. At the absolute bare minimum the White House should understand how this comes off to voters like the person your replying to.

        All it does is highlight how voters aren’t the concern, it’s the wealthy who have already made huge increases in the wealth since 2019.

        “Nothing will fundamentally change” he told the wealthy before he was elected. And credit where credit is due, Biden has kept that promise to them.

        • Franklin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Within any adminstration there will be things in and outside of their sphere of influence.

          What’s often attributed to Biden himself can often more accurately be attributed to his cabinet as a whole.

          When people say it’s not their fault they often mean the issue at hand needs a Senate resolution which will never happen because it’s controlled by the Republican party who has a “do you enemy no favors” policy whenever a democrat is in office.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            So what did Biden do for this?

            The article says:

            1. Skyrocketing interest rates.

            2. Increased fossil fuels drilling

            3. And forcing ports to operate 24/7 to flood the market with imported consumer goods.

            All things that have massive negative effects on the average American, but help large corporations and the wealthy who own them.

            Which brings us back full circle to OP’s complaint that this victory lap is celebrating something that only benefits the most wealthy Americans and fucks over the rest of us.

            Is that what we’re supposed to be congratulating Biden on?

            Is this honestly going to convince voters that Biden cares about them? Because according to polls, they don’t feel like that, and that will depress turnout which is the only way Republicans can become president.

            • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The article says:

              No, it doesn’t. The article says:

              1. Skyrocketing interest rates.
              2. Increased fossil fuels drilling
              3. Forcing ports to operate 24/7 to flood the market with imported consumer goods.
              4. Tapped into the strategic fuel reserves
              5. Resisted calls for price controls
              6. Pursued major new federal spending programs

              It also says that 3 helped cool price shocks, 6 flooded the market with new workers who saw wage gains and helped increase demand, 1 helped keep the housing market out of recession, and the combination of 1-6 helped stave off major, economy-wide layoffs. All of these helped the average American, but somehow you filtered the entire analysis through your myopia-lens and latched onto the most damning interpretation you could muster. Wonder why you did that…

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                So…

                You’re saying the article lists three more things that helped the wealthy.

                And one of your examples for how that helps the average American is it kept housing prices high?

                And you know what avoids layoffs and actually helps workers? Fixing the actual problem which is out of control wealth inequality.

                Even just trying to do something about that would pretty much guarantee Biden gets a second term.

                • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re saying the article lists three more things that helped the wealthy.

                  Nope.

                  And one of your examples for how that helps the average American is it kept housing prices high?

                  Low inventory keeps housing prices high, numbnuts. Supply & Demand. It’s not rocket science, and the President doesn’t build houses.

                  And you know what avoids layoffs and actually helps workers? Fixing the actual problem which is out of control wealth inequality.

                  So we’re back to ignoring things a single American president does have control over in favor of things they don’t?

                  Good talk, chad.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not just the stock market. There’s a wide range of metrics which are showing an improvement, and they’re comparing with what didn’t happen, which was a recession.

      What hasn’t happened is a rollback of the Reagan-era change in distribution of wealth and income. That requires getting congress to act.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That falls on your local economy and state and local elected officials. Rent is always due to local officials and how the zone the city. Local and State Corporate taxes also play a role in higher prices. If I were you, I’d check the local city council schedule and speak on those concerns.

  • willis936@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Cool. Now lower interest rates so I can at least dream about the prospect of owning a house again.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      And some day you’ll be out of college. Personal anecdotes are not meaningful data

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          By your 30s you should have already heard that personal anecdotes are not data because you were an adult in 2016.

          I had no reason to assume you were not in college.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A recession is a specific problem; avoiding a recession does not mean that all economic woe is alleviated.

      To throw out a shitty analogy, stating that a hurricane hasn’t happened doesn’t mean that there hasn’t been any bad weather at all.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, they’re looking at a broad set of measures of economic well-being. The stock market is only one metric.

      What they’ve done is pretty amazing, even if it doesn’t roll back the Reagan redistribution in favor of the wealthy, which would require congressional action.

    • Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who tf is downvoting you? You’re exactly right, to them the only thing that matters is the market, and we’re doing fine because the market is still breaking records.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        a large contingent of internet facing humans have invested in one way or another in the market. the biggest swindle in history was when companies somehow pushed their entire retirement portfolios to this external hunk of lying shit.

        tax every trade. you want to call it a market, lets fucking tax it like one. no ‘dark markets’, no secret trading… 100% in public and taxing every fucking trade.

        whats that? it would kill all the big players? ya dont say…

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    It might take another six months before it is felt across the board, but prices are noticeably lower than last year in Colorado.

    That doesn’t mean your wages are high enough for you to afford the lifestyle you want.

    • Naja Kaouthia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      For a while gas in COS was absolutely bananaballs. It’s come down rather nicely again. Filling my Impreza was painful there for a minute.

      • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Happy I can drive into CostCo without wait 15 minutes for the line for gas to stop blocking the entrance at the Barnes location. It was $2.19 this morning. It was $3.42 last year at this time ($5.41 in July 2022)

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean - there are no guarantees. Everyone claiming we are out of the woods, but if inflation stays above 3% the fed isn’t going to lower rates very fast. We could see a recession hit.

  • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Printing trillions of dollars isn’t a solution. The only reason it works is because we are the reserve currency of the world still because of oil sales. Once that changes, we are fucked.

  • Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the inflated price should come down right? …right…

    Damn when a pound of onions cost $2.50 I don’t really call this progress or “Finding a way out”

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ending inflation doesn’t mean that prices come down. It means that they stop rising. (or, more realistically, go back to rising at 2% to 3% per year)

      Deflation is when prices drop. It’s bad; what happens is that it’s more valuable to hold onto cash than to invest it in starting or expanding a business, so the economy as a whole craters like the US did in the Great Depression. You probably don’t want that.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are you kidding me? Crash the economy so hard it snaps in two. It’s time we put capitalism out of it’s misery

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Seriously! Now tell us how much time you’ve spent understanding how working class Americans lived during the great depression and what parts you’re most interested in seeing repeated

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          This is the kind of shit champagne socialists say as they sit back at brunch. Do you have any idea not only how many casualties this would cause, but how badly it would set us back from evolving past capitalism?

          How will the people surviving paycheck to paycheck, barely getting enough food on the table, going to survive? An economic collapse means food logistics cease to exist. You can’t just go to the grocery store. What will everyday people eat? What will they drink when they run out of the chemicals needed for clean water?

          Not to mention, the collapse would mean all logistics and supply chains stop working. You need a medicine by tomorrow afternoon or you’ll begin to die? Whoops, we have no idea when that’s coming in. Everyone who relies on medication to live will die. Even more who rely on it for quality of life will severely suffer. You’ll have brilliant minds that are incapable of helping design a more equitable system because they’re anxious wrecks. Any new injuries would probably be a death sentence.

          Do you understand what this would mean? An economic collapse would be a massacre of the working class and anyone needing consistent healthcare. You need bright minds to develop a better system than capitalism. They’ll all be dead or held captive by their own bodies.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I cannot imagine the level of privilege it takes to unironically make a statement like this. There are no words.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Far too many people think that they’ll survive and lead the masses in a glorious revolution that will fix all of our problems.

            For starters, the masses wouldn’t exist. An economic collapse would massacre the working class. Way too many people are already barely making ends meet. They’d all starve to death.

            This is the sort of pipedream that only the bourgeoisie think of.

          • Not_mikey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            If that’s what it’s gonna take to get a green new deal then maybe we should. Without a crisis like that, at the current trajectory both parties seem set on selling out the planet for there corporate donors.

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              The party that does it will end up out of power for a generation because it’s such a bad idea. People can make that mistake out of ignorance, but won’t do it willingly

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              How would a collapse stop that? It would only hasten it. The rich will kill anyone who currently owns food productions and take it for themselves. Corporations will advertise food and shelter, and then use the extremely high number of people desperately trying to live as slave labor. Countries would fall only to be replaced by McDonalds and ConAgra.

              And that’s without discussing the massacre of the working class. Not to mention too, the Inflation Reduction Act is an enormous amount of sustainability spending that’s spurred the entire West to do more. It may not be called the Green New Deal, but it sure as hell doesn’t fall far from it.

              • Not_mikey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I think your overestimating how much people will tolerate deprivation before turning on the system. After a certain point people will reject the system, sometimes violently , and seek a new way of organizing society. It’s why the great depression didn’t turn into the corporate hellscape you envision even though companies were just as powerful at the end of the 1920s. Barring some sort of military coup you can’t subject a majority of the population to slavery and poverty without those people revolting.

                The system relies on the at least tacit consent of the majority of the population, if you break that it becomes unstable and in that instability new ideas can come in. This is why most successful revolutions follow a crisis, one that discredits the current ruling order and allows something new to take it’s place.

                It can be dangerous though, that new thing could be FDR or it could be Hitler, but it’s bound to happen eventually and our best hope now is to lay the groundwork so that when it does we get a leader ready to usher in a new green economy.

      • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That assumes what we are experiencing is inflation. Inflation is part of the equation, but another big part is just corporations are pushing up prices and making record profits. That part can result in prices going down without causing issues.

          • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re already ahead of 90% of Lemmy with that.

            I wonder how many people here would agree with the idea of lowering taxes in order to reduce inflation.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good, I’d hate for the mods here to delete points of view that they don’t agree with 🤪. Like the Climate sub!

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not a matter of disagreement; there’s room for legit disagreement about a lot of things. It’s a matter of joining in a active fossil-fuel-industry disinformation campaign. That gets me to take content down because it’s basically impossible to have a rational discussion when that’s part of it.

              • Nudding@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thinking that humans are a net negative to the natural world and deserve the consequences of the climate apocalypse isn’t a fossil fuel industry disinformation talking point, you literally just disagree with my opinions and shadowbanned me without warning or way to appeal. Big difference in “taking content down” and the former.

                • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Doomerism is in fact a fossil fuel industry talking point; it’s part of what they do to discourage action.

                  If the only solution is suicide, nobody will act.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      At our local Wegmans a lb of onions is $0.90, $1.73, or $2.05, depending on if you want yellow, sweet, or red. It’s the exact same price at all their stores elsewhere in the US. White onions are $1.49/lb at other major grocery stores. White and yellow onions are being reported at $1.79 and $1.29 per pound, retail. Where in the heck are you paying $2.50/lb?

  • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They DID find a way out! They threw every other American citizen under the bus so they could save themselves! Claps all around, we fucking did it, the FED and their cronies won’t have to suffer the atrocity of skipping out on their daily caviar for budget reasons.

    :) There is no economic problem in U.S. of A. :)