Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoHawaii rules against public carrying of guns without permit citing ‘aloha spirit’www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square181fedilinkarrow-up1690arrow-down111
arrow-up1679arrow-down1external-linkHawaii rules against public carrying of guns without permit citing ‘aloha spirit’www.theguardian.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square181fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up72arrow-down17·1 year agoWow, he even managed to roll some sexism into that one
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down3·1 year agoHow is that sexist? I agree it sounds sexist, but is the content actually sexist?
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoI mean, we’ve already got our pitchforks out, fuck it OP is racist!!
minus-squareescaped_cruzader@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down7·1 year agoIt’s not, @SpaceNoodle did a dumb take in an effort to pile on the guy
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoNoticing that a bit in this thread
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·1 year agoThe decision to gender only the victim is questionable.
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoThe argument doesn’t sound as convincing this way: A Smith and Wesson puts the daintiest of assailants on an equal field with the burliest of women.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agothat is not a resonable test in this situation. Dont use ‘woman’ as an adjective. No need. Just use dainty/frail vs. burly.
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoOkay, but they did. I see how it sounds sexist, but how is it actually sexist? Dainty women do exist, and are on average, more dainty than dainty men.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoIMO introducing gender only to use traditional sex sterotypes to frame the discussion is sexist.
Wow, he even managed to roll some sexism into that one
How is that sexist? I agree it sounds sexist, but is the content actually sexist?
I mean, we’ve already got our pitchforks out, fuck it
OP is racist!!
It’s not, @SpaceNoodle did a dumb take in an effort to pile on the guy
Noticing that a bit in this thread
The decision to gender only the victim is questionable.
The argument doesn’t sound as convincing this way:
A Smith and Wesson puts the daintiest of assailants on an equal field with the burliest of women.
that is not a resonable test in this situation.
Dont use ‘woman’ as an adjective. No need. Just use dainty/frail vs. burly.
Okay, but they did. I see how it sounds sexist, but how is it actually sexist? Dainty women do exist, and are on average, more dainty than dainty men.
IMO introducing gender only to use traditional sex sterotypes to frame the discussion is sexist.