The White House and Democratic members of Congress called Georgia Republican’s comparison a ‘compliment’

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think we can count on Biden’s campaign being stacked with young, media-savy people, like it was last time. A lot of his 2020 stuff was pretty well done, you could tell he had a pretty in-touch team that knew how to present him well. Literally all he has to do is not get in their way, and they can ride Dark Brandon memes into 2024.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the figures I found, Trump increased the debt by $6.7 trillion while Biden increased it by $2.5 trillion (over three of his four years). Note that the first year of spending for any president is controlled by the last president, so 2020 spending was Trump’s, but also 2016 was Obama’s.

    Looking at just proposed programs, Biden’s student loan plan would have cost 0.4 trillion, or $400 billion. Meanwhile, Trump’s ‘tax repatriation holiday’ (companies illegally hiding money overseas to avoid taxes, make one year where you don’t get taxes for bringing the money back to USA) cost taxpayers $465 billion.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pepperidge Farm remembers the last couple of years of the Clinton administration when we had an actual budget surplus and all the talk was of what to do with this surplus. But then the “fiscal conservatives” said “Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter”.

      • Saneless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        And they blamed Obama for being spendy (because even $1 to a poor person is wasteful) while GWB racked up the biggest budget in history many times.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Deficits don’t matter, but a surplus is still dope AF. It shouldn’t come from cutting services like we did in the 90s tho.

        I do agree it’s insane that the GOP went from “deficits don’t matter” when they control the Presidency to “shut down the gov over the debt ceiling” when they don’t tho.

      • randon31415@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, when the house is under control of the same party as the white house, they normally just start with the president’s budget outline and cut and add stuff. But that didn’t happen with Trump, so you have to go back to 09-10 for the last time the president’s budget wasn’t dead on arrival.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      COVID, which happened under Trumps administration, which throws any sort of comparisons out the window. Everyone, democrats and republicans alike, were crying for government handouts in the form of free payments, in order to survive. It was a (hopefully) once in a lifetime unprecedented situation that destroyed most budgets around the world.

      Also neither Trump nor Biden are responsible for the budget surplus/deficit.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh to be a fly on the wall when she first saw this. She must be tearing that shitty dye job out of her head by the roots lol

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine thinking those were bad things! That’s close to 50% of the US voting population (and I’d like to pretend it was only them, but the rest of the world isnt necessarily better).

    How the fuck did we get here? Actually scratch that, i know that humans are greedy, tribal animals who are driven by biological urges only sometimes obscured by higher level thought. The bigger question is how the fuck did we manage to make it as far as we have?

      • Jay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Marj’s ex husband has been asking himself that same question for a long time.

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have the American people stop being lazy bastards, generally. Especially young people.

        2020 was the highest turnout in a century. And it was still only 2/3 of eligible voters. 79,000,000 eligible voters just went “eh”.

        The primaries were even worse than that. The 2022 midterms were the second highest turnout for midterms this millennium. With 52%…. Despite 69% of eligible voters being registered. A ton of people just stayed home instead of making our highest civil duty a priority.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I agree, but part of the problem is that people are tired of choosing between 2-3 old people candidates that dont have their best interests in mind. In the case of Biden and Trump, Biden is most definitely less of an asshole and way more qualified than the Trump, but he’s still going to do what’s best for corporations, not what’s best for the majority of the US population.

          I vote myself, but at the same time I understand the apathy especially from the younger generations. They are presented with 2 people who are completely out of touch with them, and the issues they will face in their lifetimes. I don’t think that they are lazy, they just feel helpless and like their choice doesn’t matter or make a difference.

          I don’t know how we fix this issue, as it is a problem with the voting system itself. The best we can do is just vote and pick the lesser of two evils. So I also encourage others to do the same, but I don’t look down on anyone for not voting.

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So vote in the primaries…

            The Dem primaries had like 10 people this last go round. From 38 to 78.

            Bernie was the front runner and people were counting Biden out until South Carolina when nobody showed up for Bernie.

            Voting is not a once every 4 year thing. There are elections at the local level all. The. Fucking. Time. And those are even more important. And they have even less turnout than the big ones. I have had 8 elections since 2020 in my local area. I vote in every single one of them.

            Who do you think rise through the ranks through parties and become prominent? People who get elected at lower levels. They have track records.

            There is absolutely zero excuse for not voting. I will look down on anyone that doesn’t vote but bitches about the system. They simply do not care. They say they do but won’t do the one damn thing to actually change anything. Everything starts at the local level.

            • VenoraTheBarbarian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I vote myself, but at the same time I understand the apathy especially from the younger generations.

              You came out swinging with a lot of pent up frustration, dude. The other commenter says they do vote. I grant you they didn’t mention the primary, but I have no reason to believe they don’t vote in the primary, too.

              So I also encourage others to do the same, but I don’t look down on anyone for not voting.

              I feel like this is where you meant to put your energy, since you said you DO look down on people who don’t vote but do complain. But we need both kinds of people in the world. Some people respond better to patience, others to a kick in the butt. You’re both doing it right as long as you’re both trying to convince people to vote.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            people are tired of choosing between 2-3 old people

            You’re NEVER going to get a good option. You vote for the least-worse. Always – lather, rinse, repeat.

            I’m not sure how this is confusing. Show up at the polling station, with some idea of each loser’s plan, and pick the one who can pull off the most of a decent plan – or, said a different way, whoever will suck the least.

            • DragonAce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re NEVER going to get a good option. You vote for the least-worse. Always – lather, rinse, repeat.

              That is the entire problem and telling people “Thats just the way it is, deal with it” is not going to solve it. Our “democratic” system is completely broken, we are given the illusion of choice when in reality all candidates are preselected and paraded in front of the public as if they have our best interests at heart, when in reality they all have the same mandate from their corporate overlords. The US is a corporatocracy masquerading as a democracy, we as ordinary citizens have no real say in the matter. That needs to change, full stop!

              • Wiz@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That needs to change, full stop!

                America’s system of voting “first past the post” ensures that one of the top two candidates will win. It pretty much guarantees a two-party system will win.

                So, the strategy would be:

                  1. Try to get an alternative voting system like “Ranked Choice Voting” in place. This has been done successfully in Maine and Alaska, I think. We need more of it. [Yes, I know Ranked Choice is not perfect, but it’s definitely better than we have.]
                  1. Until then, your best vote (mathematically) is to vote for one of the top two candidates that is closest to what you want. Yes, you’ll have to hold your nose a few times to vote for the “least worst” of the two, but honestly, it’s better than the alternative, of having the “worst worst” of the two.

                Hope this helps.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You don’t even have to oppose the two party system to support ranked choice. I like ranked choice, especially for state reps/senators, and I’m very pro two-party system.

                  I know it opens the door to other parties I don’t necessarily want to exist, but it’s just a good idea full stop.

        • transmatrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Definitely times I wish we were more like Australia where I’m pretty certain voting is legally required.

          • VitoScaletta@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah election day is a holiday here, and voting is open for weeks in advance leading up to it just in case people can’t find the time.

            Not to mention the fact that we have preferential voting, so people are better off putting more independent/smaller parties first so they have a better chance of getting seats

            Also the sausage sizzle

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I cannot imagine how anyone could think being compared to FDR would be a black spot for a progressive. I wish he’d be at least one Judicial Procedures Reform Bill closer to FDR.

      • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What makes you think progressives were the target audience for her speech? The kind of person who likes fdr was almost certainly going to be voting blue regardless, and nothing she said would realistically change it, so why bother trying?

    • VubDapple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? Those would only be good things if the right people benefited from them and everyone else (all the people in the outgroups who might as well not be thought of as people) is cut off from them.

    • Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republicans are so far gone that they forgot what it’s like to actually help American citizens

    • Techmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know, they sound horrible, right? Imagine tax dollars going back into the communities that pay them. God what kind of awful country would do such a thing?

  • ProfessorZhu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It drives me nuts how so many people just claim FDR was any kind of socialist. FDR was the best capitalist the system ever made, he was responsible for saving capitalism in America and making it a bulwark against the waves of facsim and socialism that was sweeping the world.

    • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You give that Neanderthal brain of hers too much credit. Sad truth is that for her audience, all of those things she called out are considered negatives because they cut into their bottom line. They know right from wrong, they just don’t give a fuck if it means making a little more at the end of the day

  • hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish there were someone who wasn’t evil or whose only selling point was they aren’t bad. Is having inspiring canidates really too much to ask for?

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The most pressing crisis to all of humanity is the climate and somehow Biden got through congress an estimated $1.3 trillion climate bill. I’m not sure a Bernie could’ve pulled that off.

      You don’t have to love or even like him, but he has selling points other than not being Trump.

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, kinda, yeah. You saw what happened to Sanders.

      But so long as the red team is in full literal Nazi mode, we really shouldn’t bitch too much about the not-evil options. We don’t want to sentence the US with another Trump because the alternative is uninspiring.

      It’s a shitty system, but let’s work with that we got.

      • Techmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s nothing wrong with a boring, uninspiring president. Obama had a ton of charisma but Biden’s presidency is honestly a lot better. Sure, the country sucks right now, but at least Biden is trying to make it better, after the last guy did so much to try and destroy everything our nation is built on. It’s going to take a long time and a lot of hard work to crawl out of this hole the GOP has dug us into. I think there are people who could have done better than Biden, but in all honesty he’s probably the best president we’ve had in my lifetime. I give him a B+.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honestly, does he even need campaigning? Like since when did you read a political ad or billboard and was like “hmm my mind has officially changed”. Most of people’s mind has already been made up. He could really sit there and not do anything and end up winning.

    Edit: yeah. We need every fighting chance we get. Release the dark brandon memes.

    • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      After 2016, I would not be so complacent. Never underestimate the stupidity and goldfish-like memory of the average American.

      • RandallFlagg@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I heard Trump won the Republican nomination in 2016 I literally laughed out loud thinking there is absolutely no way, 0% chance, better odds that the sun will explode, this country is pretty stupid but not THAT stupid. And sure enough, I was wrong. That was when I realized that the GOP is very, very good at manipulating stupid people.

        • Cheems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing you didn’t consider there is that there’s like 100% chance the sun will explode. Probably not any time soon, but eventually

        • Saneless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can’t underestimate decades of getting people to subconsciously hate Hillary Clinton and what that does to voters. Many hated her. Few actually had a reason when asked

          There’s a reason the GOP goes so hard at AOC in 2020+. They see her as a real threat to the presidency in 2040+ and they want decades of demonization in the bank

          • Sbhinclusion@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            @Saneless @RandallFlagg The Conservatives in #Canada do the same repetitive attacks on #Trudeau and are having some success- many cite a hate for Trudeau but when asked why they have literally no reason- unfortunate so many want to be told what to think rather then vetting information- critical thinking needs to be a value not a nuisance.

            • Gordon J Holtslander@mstdn.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              @Sbhinclusion @Saneless @RandallFlagg The hate is that their assumptions and privileges are being called out. That these no longer protect and isolate them from the world’s problems. They hate that they must make hard decisions that effect themselves and the ones they love. They hate that they are vulnerable. It’s new and it’s ugly and they consider it unfair. Saying F*ck has never solved a problem

              • Saneless@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah that’s definitely not unique to Canada unfortunately

                Even in local politics we have idiots here who are blaming “out of state corporate interests” for wanting to vote yes for a bill

                MF the only reason you’re parroting that shit is because of the corporate interests who bribe the politicians who tell you want to think

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m fairly certain that part of the Cambridge Analytica data manipulation scandal thing was that they managed to throw an election by targeting users on the fence and susceptible to the “I don’t need to vote” or the “voting doesn’t matter” type comments and memes.
          They targeted their client’s opposition’s voters with these, caused a really low turnout of voters in that demographic, allowing their client to win.

          Don’t get sucked into these things.
          Vote how you want, even if it’s just the uninspiring, boring, lesser evil, whatever.