The Supreme Court on Friday overturned a landmark 40-year-old decision that gave federal agencies broad regulatory power, upending their authority to issue regulations unless Congress has spoken clearly.

  • carbonari_sandwich@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    And this is a massive increase in authority for the courts. If there is ambiguity in the wording of a law, it’s open for a lawsuit.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The dissent on the “it’s a gratuity, not a bribe lol” decision shows that ambiguity isn’t even necessary. Same with the bump stocks ruling. And seceral before that.

      The conservatives will pretend there is ambiguity and write pages of rambling pseudo logic no matter how clear the law is.