Summary

Harvard announced that, starting in the 2025-2026 academic year, it will not charge tuition for students from families earning under $200,000.

Students from households making less than $100,000 will attend for free. Previously, free tuition applied only to families earning under $85,000.

The expansion aims to make Harvard more accessible to middle-income families.

This follows similar moves by other wealthy universities, including MIT, which expanded its financial aid last November.

  • Lemmist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Student: My family lives there and I live here. We don’t interact. Why would their wealth be of any importance if I couldn’t have a cent out of it?

    • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you don’t interact with them then that means you are feeding yourself, which means you have a job.

      Congrats you aren’t making more than 200k. Enjoy.

      Not that complicate is it? Now if you are there and your parent are the way the fuck over there and you are sucking on the tit then you will add your parents income.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        There has to be some objective method of categorising whether someone lives off their parents income or not: it’s a relevant question to ask.

        Someone can live in the same house as their parents while paying full rent and being responsible for their own food, effectively being economically independent. They can also live on the other side of the country while being 100% sponsored by their parents. It’s not trivial to categorise whether someone qualifies for something like this.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, and the federal government already has a way to make that determination. I forget what it is because it’s been years, but they have one.

          • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I still think it’s a fair question to ask, because as far as I understand, there’s nothing forcing Harvard to use the same method as the federal government. Have you seen anything on how they plan to do that?

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s a relevant question to ask if we want to continue with the system of paying for higher education. Which maybe we don’t. You don’t pay for high school.

          • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            It’s a relevant question either way: Regardless whether you think all education should be free (which I agree, it should), this is about how they plan on resolving this specific case of making education more accessible right now.

            Whether education should be free altogether is a whole different question. In that case, it would make sense to also discuss whether it should be free for everyone, or whether there should be some income limit.

            In Norway we’ve landed on a solution where the education itself is free, but in order to qualify for a government stipend and government-backed loan (with very good interest rates) in order to support yourself studying you need to have a fortune below a certain (high) threshold. Personally, I think that’s a nice trade off between accessibility and preventing rich people from making money off of a welfare program.

          • Duranie@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The student doesn’t pay for highschool, but there are still fees. My income was low enough that they waived the (roughly) $500-700 a year though. They based it off the paperwork to qualify for free/reduced lunches.

      • TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        idk how it works in the US but in the UK you have to provide evidence that you’ve been living without any family support for more than 3 years, I had a housemate who had to work every hour he didn’t have lectures because he’d only been on his own for 2 and a half years. Granted that it only affected his maintenance loan and not the tuition loan but he still couldn’t afford to eat.

      • Lemmist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not that complicate is it?

        And what stops every student from saying that they’re on their own? I came here with a simple and logical question. I expect answers, not sarcasm.

        • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          They will ask you for your taxes for previous years that shows you as being on your own. There are teens that do get emancipated from the parents before 18, which they also have to show they can live and support themselves.

          FAFSA, don’t know if it will continue to be alive since these assholes are destroying everything will ask you these questions. California also had a CCC program that use to help with getting free college. If so depends on your state as well.

          My bad for sounding like a dick.

        • duchess@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Every student could apply for parent-independent support. There are processes from other countries to learn from.