• Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Circumcision, fgm, the so-called husband stitch… wtf, people? If you’ve got genitals you’re happy with it seems a challenge just to keep them intact against the lunatics who want to chop and stitch. What is wrong with humans?

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Jesus christ, it feels like everyday I learn a new dreadful horror about American life. How the fuck have we not run out of these creepy facts yet? The country is soo fucked up, I swear to god… It’s honestly hard to belive it’s a real place, it didn’t really sink in how much of a shit hole it is until I saw it my self… It’s a twilight world where pain is a virtue for some reason.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Edit: misread. I thought you asked what this was about. Yeah, I’m sure it wasn’t just here.

        Men would sometimes have doctors add an extra stitch to women after childbirth to make them tighter. I think I’ve even heard sometimes doctors did it without concent of either party. Some women didn’t even know it was done until they had complications and found out.

        • DokPsy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s called the husband stitch and it is exactly as horrid as it seems if not moreso. Hopefully a dying trend.

  • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    271
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    #womeninmalefields is describing common situations and phrases that women experience and turning them upside down by switching genders.

    The analogy to this one would be a man telling a surgeon to surgically tighten a woman’s vagina after giving birth. This is a common and disgusting joke.

    • klemptor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      249
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Common and disgusting, but unfortunately not always a joke. You probably know this but for the benefit of others who may not be aware, the Husband Stitch is a real thing that used to be pretty commonly done regardless of what the woman wanted and often without her foreknowledge or consent. It’s an extra stitch or two placed when sewing a woman back up after a vaginal tear or episiotomy during labor. The purpose is to make the woman “tighter” so her husband can still enjoy having sex with her even though she’s given birth, which is staggeringly misogynistic and cruel. And it usually results in really painful sex for the woman because her vaginal opening is artificially small plus now it has inflexible scar tissue. It’s a horrific thing to do to a woman, especially after giving birth.

      • StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        To add to your “for the benefit of others” explanation, this is also not a historical relic. It’s still happening.

        I work with refugees and a lot of women escaping fundie warzones are living with variations of this nightmare. So much mutilation, as little girls, preteens, post-giving-birth… Infections are common, tearing is common, and sex is torture. I’ve been doing this job long enough that I recognize the walk.

      • felykiosa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        67
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        still enjoy having sex with her

        If you need that to enjoy your partner you don’t deserve them. That disgusting

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Another thing to note is that the episiotomy itself is no longer a recommended procedure for routine births. The incision lengthens recovery time and brings complications of its own.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Unfortunately, medical violence is a thing and many professionals, even when saying the episiotomy is a decision for the woman, put it in such a way that the message conveyed is that the episiotomy makes giving birth easier and quicker. What is witheld is that it makes it easier for them.

          Giving birth was turned into a surgical event, when it is only a phisiological one.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Giving birth was turned into a surgical event, when it is only a phisiological one.

            How can a woman give birth without the machine that goes PING?

          • Seleni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Speaking as someone who would have been stillborn if not for a C-section, there are some surgical procedures that are kind of important.

            • qyron@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              12 hours ago

              A C-section is a surgical act and extremely important as it has the potential to save lifes, both of mothers and children.

              The matter at hand is not about deeming all medical acts performed during a delivery as useless but to acknowledge that many are performed routinely without need and even without the agreement, previous information or consent of the woman and mother to be.

              One such is that oh-so-important act being routenily abused, with doctors pushing it to women with the argument that it is the safest way to plan the delivery. But planning a delivery is only a concern for the physician. If a pregnancy is normal under all aspects and there are no telling signs the delivery will be complicated, why point women to an unnecessary surgical act?

        • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I was under the impression it was forthe woman’s benefit, that it is easier for a cut to heal than a tear. Is that not the case? Is the risk of tearing overblown?

          • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I think you actually have that backward. In general, a jagged tear heals quicker than an incision because there is more surface area in contact between the two pieces, so a larger number of cells can be working to repair the tissue. That said, I’m not a doctor and it’s been 10 years since my wife and I looked into this before our first kid, so I may be misremembering.

            • medgremlin@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              These days, an epesiotomy is done to direct the tear. If the tear is allowed to happen spontaneously, it can go through nerves, arteries, and pelvic floor muscles, greatly increasing the chances of permanent problems with things like prolapses or fistulas at worst, and more commonly, long term problems with incontinence.

            • 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Nope, you got it right: my wife had to c-sections and afaik they cut just enough tissue to make possible to tear it apart. It healed very well.

              • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Glad your wife healed well; my wife had three c-sections and the first one was done by a very old-school OB in an emergency situation, so she never stood a chance. That said, even old-school c-sections are better than my wife and son dying in childbirth, so I’m still grateful for modern medicine, but it would have been nice if it was a little more “modern”

                • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Were the second and third child almost guaranteed to be born by C-section? My GF first childbirth had 2 incidents that had risks for the second pregnancy. We were a bit scared for the second birth. But it when the opposite way. She almost gave birth in the car. There wasn’t even an hour and a half between the first real contractions and the birth of our child.

                  I’m asking because I am curious to hear about different experiences than mine

      • Luminocta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I worked for a man that thought it would be a funny thing to say soon after the delivery.

        Look, I’m a guy. I laughed, until his (now ex) said that he actually said it.

        I mean come on. It’s funny as a joke, you don’t ACTUALLY say that to a delivery nurse, my god.

      • valkyre09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        96
        ·
        15 hours ago

        After the mother gives birth to a healthy baby boy, the father leans to the doctor and whispers “how long until we can have sex?”. The doctor replies, “I clock off at 3.”

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              That’s very generalising though.

              Personally, I try to avoid that whenever possible.

              • Kalysta@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 hours ago

                When this was invented, the majority of doctors were men.

                It’s not generalizing if it’s true.

              • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Good on you.

                It’s not generalising tho, these women describe situations they have experienced.

              • EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Huh, and here all the men I know have never even the slightest bit upset about broad generalizing statements about men because they are secure in the knowledge that the statement doesn’t apply to them… Sounds like a skill issue tbh.

                • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  This statement doesn’t apply to me. Still, when I am constantly lumped in the same category as rapists, sexual predators and any or all other demeaning terms, it does start to affect my self-esteem and make me doubt myself.

                  Just like when you look at social medias and all the women are perfect. You know it’s a tuned photo with a lot of work behind it. But you see it all the time : on your phone, TV and ads in general. And it does affect women, even if the beauty standards are irrealist, and humans come in all size and forms.

                  This is the same principle in the two cases.

    • SeekPie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Thanks for explaining it, wouldn’t have understood it otherwise.

    • GiantFloppyCock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      108
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This isn’t boomer humor, it’s highlighting a misogynistic practice by flipping gender roles - pretty non-boomer imo.

    • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      For reals. I’m mid-30s and I only remember hearing about this when I was younger. I’d completely forgotten about it, and never would have asked for or suggested it happen.

      Good job bringing it back to the forefront so misogynistic men can know of it and use it to torment a fresh, new generation of women.

      If your partner jokes about having surgery done to you without your consent, just leave them–whether you’re a man or a woman.

    • It’s to highlight something fucked up that’s sometimes done on women after giving birth.

      Quoting another comment in the thread:

      the Husband Stitch is a real thing that used to be pretty commonly done regardless of what the woman wanted and often without her foreknowledge or consent. It’s an extra stitch or two placed when sewing a woman back up after a vaginal tear or episiotomy during labor. The purpose is to make the woman “tighter” so her husband can still enjoy having sex with her even though she’s given birth, which is staggeringly misogynistic and cruel. And it usually results in really painful sex for the woman because her vaginal opening is artificially small plus now it has inflexible scar tissue.