• BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the ties between addictive behavior and conspiracy theorists

  • EvilTwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The moon landing was faked.

    NASA got Kubrick to direct, and being a perfectionist, he insisted they shoot on location.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cause nothing screams “sound judgement” like a nicotine addiction.

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I love when people are like “if you get a windfall of money you’ll probably go bankrupt. Look at the statistics from lottery winners, 70% of them end up broke.”

      Ah yes, a subset of the population whose only common traits are that they gamble and make objectively terrible financial decisions. Obviously this group should be the benchmark for the financial literacy and money management of the general population.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, though let’s not act as if the family and friends constantly asking for money or expectating it, old acquaintances suddenly claiming you abused/assaulted/scammed them knowing you’ll just settle out of court to get them to fuck off, haven’t happened even to fiscally responsible people as well.

        There’s more than just bad financial literacy with some of them, as not all lottery winners are always broke gamblers. The majority are, but not all. So the fact that almost every single person loses it all in a couple years should indicate that it still has massive potential to make your life harder even if you know what you’re doing and don’t succumb to massive overspending.

        • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think I could actually lay low pretty easy. Everything I’d buy people know I’ve been saving up for for a while. And they all take time to get even if you have the money so it wouldn’t be all at once.

          Plus my “dream [property/vehicle/hobby items/etc]” are all fairly atainable. Like theres a certain classic vehicle I want that usually goes for 20-30k just the configuration I want is a little difficult to find.

          • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not all states allow you to collect winnings anonymously. I doubt your relatives are actively monitoring lottery winners, but there may be some sleazy, ambulance chasing lawyers that do and would “preemptively” reach out to family and friends to let them know they’re happy to represent them if they “just so happen” to suffer any damages from you.

      • TheGoldenV@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well now I wonder if there’s a control for that in the studies. Would I make good or poor choices in the same situation?

        I’d still roll the dice.

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      A used heroin needle poll however, that’s how you get the opinions of our greatest minds

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is just like the tip cups that say “Star Trek” vs “Star Wars” or whatever. It’s not about the actual choices. It’s about getting people to put stuff in one or the other.

    This question gets people to put their butts in the disposal, rather than on the ground.

    • GoosLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also, I don’t believe the moon landing was faked, but I would totally put my cigarette butt in that one. Get my butt vote, conspiracy nuts. Who cares.

      The actual label is the least factor in where I put it.

      (I don’t know why my brain feels the need to clarify this to strangers on the internet, but for the record, I don’t actually smoke)

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do more smokers think the moon landing is fake?

    Do people who think the moon landing was fake smoke more?

    Are people who think the moon landing is fake more likely to smoke?

    Is “fake” just closer to the smokers?

  • gatelike@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    this is more of a study of what percentage of smokers here have a sense of humor. People don’t take these things seriously for the most part, voting no at least brings a moment of joy if you consider it humorous.

  • niemcycle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Majority of people believe the Moon landing was real. Conspiracy Georg, who smokes 100 packs a day was an outlier and should not have been counted.

  • Piemanding@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    One of the biggest proponents of the moon landing being real is that the USSR believed it happened. You can imagine the amount of sensors and cameras pointed at the moon to denounce the US if it was fake. Especially while at the height of the space race. Whoever got to the moon first would be the ones to claim it.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, this is a great way to determine if smokers are idiots.

    Looking like the majority is a yes.

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What really gets me is the comments here revealing how little Lemmy users understand the average human