• slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    Very happy for the success of this game, even if it’s not my style. It seems like a breath of fresh air among soulless cash grabs

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    I know literally nothing about this game and I mostly play FPS or racing games. What even is this game and what does the actual gameplay look like? I don’t give a crap about stories as I always skip them. I just want to know what the actual gameplay loop consists of.

  • Blxter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ll purchase this in around a year or more with dlc still playing the first to completion almost done with it on my last hardcore playthrough getting virgin + merciful + hardcore achievements… Really good one of my favorite 100%s so far

    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      My roommate said that Dragon Age was going to be the most woke game and that he would never spend his money on a game published by EA. He bought it day 1 and beat it 3 times. He fucking loves that game.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That article reads like that other shitpiece that called Ghost of Tsushima racist for portraying Mongols as evil. Like, bruh. It wasn’t called “the dark ages” for a lack of sunlight.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s called the dark ages for a lack of records. Not sure where you’re trying to go with this argument.

          • rtxn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            It’s a reference to a line in a Stargate episode, uttered by a historian in reference to outdated medieval practices (specifically trepanning). If I have to make a point, it is that historical fiction about a specific time and culture should reflect the values and prejudices of the people and not be condemned for it.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Except that isn’t what happens with stuff like this. It isn’t reflecting “the values and prejudices of the people” at the time. It is reflecting them in the modern day.

              The problem with KCD1 wasn’t that it depicted low tech people (which it didn’t. It very much went the route of “alchemy is science”) or even the very questionable views on women (that is a very complex topic). It was the insistence that medieval Czech was a land of white people (and a specific phenotype at that…) and blah blah blah. When the vast majority of historical evidence is that medieval Europe was a mixing pot (there is a reason that terms like “moor” existed and plenty of people brought servants, slaves, and even wives back from the various crusades and Crusades).

              Which gets back to “the dark ages” being about a lack of records more than anything else. But people interpret “Well. there is no record of an arab being in this entire country for 300 years!” as “The white men kept the brown folk out” rather than “Well… there also aren’t a lot of records period. But if you look a few miles to the east you DO see records acknowledging this as though it weren’t a big deal”

              Which also lines up with the lead dev being a piece of shit chud who was a loud voice during gamergate.

              And it also left a REALLY bad taste in the mouth of people (who give a shit) who read any of the discussion on this and saw WAY too many people talk about how it is important to have a game about Czech that remembers the glory days back when everyone was white and strong and blah blah blah.

              And, as a quick aside: KCD1 is still the most bog standard power fantasy fantasy there can be. The combat is more or less “What if you took two HEMA seminars?” and is still star wars kid slicing through plate mail. And it is especially funny because the “historians” that were consulted? No, they weren’t medieval history specialists or even HEMA specialists. If memory serves, it was a guy who specialized in WW1 tanks. And, while people can obviously have multiple passions, it really showed. Also, you are the son of a blacksmith (?) who bangs his way around Bohemia to become bestest friends with the king and blah blah blah.

              Which brings us to Ghost of Tsushima. I genuinely love this game even if there is zero chance I ever finish it (I can’t stand ubi open world games and it is more ubi than ubi has been in years). Yes, it is 500% written by a white guy who studied the blade. But it is well acted and well “directed” and really feels like I am playing a Kurosawa film. That said, it definitely depicts the Mongols as violent barbarians who outright use civilians as target practice and do nothing but <REDACTED> and pillage because violence is fine but the other thing triggers ratings issues.

              And in the sense of needing a villain that justifies Jin giving up the pretense that samurai were anything other than violent warlords in armor? It works. But if you actually look at politics and cultural shifts in Japan over the past few decades, you’ll see why it was very well received that All Mongols are Barbarian Monsters and so forth. It is the same problem as depicting “generic brown people” in “generic Middle East” as more or less slobbering zombies to be mowed down.

              Which gets back to the key point. Pretty much all of these “We are just depicting the <blank> period as it was” isn’t doing that. It is portraying things through the lens of the modern day which is something that is accepted amongst historic fiction writers (more on that shortly). So if they crank up the whiteness? There is a reason.

              Now, I said I was going to talk about historic fiction writers. If you ARE interested in “what things were like”, I STRONGLY recommend authors like Miles Cameron (I think that is his pen name for SFF, but they redirect to the same site). Historic fiction can be awesome and the best stories are the ones that need to have a footnote or appendix of “Yo, this ACTUALLY happened.” because of how wild it is. And you’ll find that the writers who actually put the effort in to cite things tend to have much more nuanced depictions of both sides (because it is incredibly rare to have a genuinely evil empire) and are a lot less focused on racial purity because… that shit wasn’t a thing once we got past “The people on that side of the river all have red hair and are evil. I hear their wives and daughters are hot though…”

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          For the record, academics and historians generally don’t use the term “the dark ages” anymore.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Definitely deserved. I’ve played it for 10+ hours so far and it’s such an improvement on the already excellent first game. It even runs much better on the same hardware.

    • Lupus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It even runs much better on the same hardware.

      That’s great news, I was worried about performance.

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That actually sounds wrong. Do they use the same level of graphics or was the first game optimized THAT badly?

        • Hubi@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Pretty sure the first game was just not optimized very well. I can run KCD2 at a very stable 60+ FPS on my RTX 3060 on high/ultra settings. The first one had about 20 FPS less in comparable environments. Not too surprising, considering that it was the dev team’s first CryEngine project. It’s notoriously hard to work with.

  • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    hopefully the combat system is improved so you actually have a chance of at least escaping when fighting more than one enemy

    • otterpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You can fight 1v10 later on, but in the beginning of the first game you were literally a peasant. It makes sense even a 1v2 would represent a mortally dangerous situation until you get better skills and gear.

      Really it’s what made the game so good in my opinion, I’ve never felt a character grow like that before.

      • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        what I’m talking about is more that running away isn’t actually an option unless you can win the fight already because if you try to run they can just instantly knock you down.